Interesting Ken. Well you've got the best of both worlds there.
Greg.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Crawford
Thanks Greg,
I am finding there is more information that is useful for decon (you need good sampling) so I was able to be recover this thin and faint dust lane because of it. But I do miss the sensitity of the u9000 larger pixels as it does do deeper faster. So I am finding I need to image about 20 - 25% longer to get the same S/N.
The great thing is that both cameras have the same body style so in the winter when the seeing is not quite as good for me, I can throw the u9000 on my 10 slot filter wheel with just a few bolts. It is very easy to swap cameras now based on what I am imaging and the seeing conditions.
Regards,
|