View Single Post
  #50  
Old 08-08-2011, 06:12 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Paul you might be misleading people believing these are the same class of mount.

the MX is more like an AP900 than a Mach 1 GTO

MX has 40 kg payload vs 20.5 stated for Mach 1.

No doubt its a fine instrument but probbaly more like a VERY upmarket G-11 than alternative to MX.

Bearing in mind this opinion is comming from someone who has seen neither mount though and just going of internet specs.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pluck View Post
Slightly off-topic, but of possible interest to anyone following this thread currently considering a mount in this class, I draw your attention to Astro-Physics who are advertising immediate availability of Mach1 GTO mounts from their latest production run. As someone who has worked with and owns a Paramount ME, I must say that the Mach1 has outstanding performance.

They are also almost $3000 less expensive.

Paul
Reply With Quote