Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Make some constructive suggestions for how to structure future conversations Phil.
The issue I see in this one, is that we have two entirely different levels of science conversation .. the one I started and, the one Archy is attempting to promote. There'd be no angst if that was recognised. (Some recognition of that by Archy would help).
Cheers
|
The ToS gives those outlines as best as it can. And the heading of this forum gives a generalised outline as to what should or shouldn't be in here.
It's not so much different levels of conversation as it's to do with giving of the proper respect to those who do contribute to this forum and who have the knowledge to make meaningful contributions without them, or the people asking questions they want answered, being disrupted and castigated by people who have no intention of either learning off anyone who makes a contribution or is just out to stir up discord amongst the forum members.