Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar
OK Fred understand now. 20 min exposures and lots of em...... I'll stick with the 7nm I think.
You could frame it up and down and save my neck a bit. I'm getting older you know.
|
Yes, 7nm sure lets in more photons, and goes deeper, but slightly less Ha detail. 3nm subs are noisier too. there are annoying trade offs either way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hothersall
Still a good result and 3nm really strips the stars down, I use the 5nm including NII line. Detail here seem tough to get looking at others efforts in Oz with the JetStream interfering. This is the best structure I have seen this season even though its quite soft.
John.
|
There are some subs from an earlier LX200 12" effort thrown in to reduce noise. Those subs were not as sharp, but had more signal. I was kidding about the stars BTW, I healed them out
. Ill do this again with more RCOS data, much sharper, but its a bit of a "done that" sort of object so only when theres nothing else to image in my limited sky view.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jase
Up close and personal. A no BS image. I like your style Fred. Pleased it hasn't changed.
|
Thanks Jase, removing stars is BS, but I get away with it ....... sometimes
.