Interestingly, the final results of GP-B were only announced a couple of months ago (4 May 2011), after a launch date of April 2004.
The announcement is
here.
(GR vindicated).
Interesting … it took a while, but the results are there for all to see.
Perhaps Mr Cahill will get a bit quieter from now on ?
From
the Faq's section:
Quote:
I have my own alternative theory of gravitation and/or cosmology; how can I get someone at GP-B or the broader physics community to take my ideas seriously?
Answer: As noted in the answer to Question #2 just above, the refereed or peer-reviewed journal article constitutes a well-established methodology for communicating with other scientists about theoretical and experimental research ideas. If you have an alternative to Einstein's general theory of relativity that you feel better explains the phenomena of gravitation, we suggest that you follow long-estabished scientific procedures for communicating with other physicists—namely join a professional society of physicists, such as the American Physical Society, attend physics meetings, and submit a paper for peer review, presentation at a physics meeting and/or publication. Question #2 above contains a list of physics journals that cover the field of gravitational physics.
Finally, if you wish to analyze the GP-B data with regards to your theory, see Question #5 in the Program Status & Experimental Results section above for links to obtaining the GP-B data from the National Space Sciences Data Center.
|
.. haven't seen Cahill publishing in the American Physical Society journal .. I think his papers have been reviewed in other publications though ..
Cheers