Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ernest Wilson
Craig S
Do you rubbish Cahill because you do not regard his paper as mainstream physics, or because you have evidence to refute his work.
I hope it is the latter and that you will share it with us.
|
Ernie;
I do not, in any way, rubbish his work. Cahill has published many papers which attempt to pave the way for furthering theoretical and often highly speculative concepts. There is much public discussion amongst theoreticians at this formative end of the scientific process (as one would expect).
I must admit, I am having difficulty in understanding how you see this paper having anything in common with the originally posted Xavier Borg pseudoscientific reference. In the absence of some explanatory words from you on the connection (if any), I am left perplexed about what kind of discussion you are seeking. A conversation which attempts to mix Borg and Cahill content requires careful framing.
The topic requires a thorough understanding of Quantum Field Theory, and is dependent on the existence of an agreed theory of Quantum Gravity.
If you are seeking such a discussion, then I would suggest this is a topic for another thread. Some contextual words from yourself to frame such a discussion, would be needed in order for others to assist you in meeting your objectives (whatever those may be) and to avoid the perils of slipping into arguments over different interpretations of speculation.
Cheers