Guys
Thanks for info so far on this yes I will post a pic or two in the near future
of course I have been trying to find out this end what can be the answer I have come across an interesting review on the 102m which by the way for any purists reading I put it down as F9.1 when it is in fact F9.8 (phew thats feels better)Lol.
anyway back to the review in summing it said "pity it does not have a 2"focuser" I have looked all over for some mention of one with a 2" focuser on to no avail
The mission My fellow astronimers (should you wish to accept it!) anyone seen one, used one, owned one,kicked one with a 2" focuser on it
"off for tea"
ITS AN ENGLISH THING. Lol
|