|
I haven't actually read the physics.org article, so I don't know if Chris Blake actually said what was reported, but you have to remember Craig that they're trying to "sell" the science that was done, so they tart it up a bit to make it sound gee whiz. That's your typical journalist twist on things. Only thing is they get it wrong when they do this and invariably misquote what people say and misrepresent what was done.
The average punter reading the article would find it rather boring if the story was reported as it should've been. Actually, they wouldn't understand the science behind it, anyway.
|