View Single Post
  #18  
Old 14-05-2011, 05:59 PM
PlanetMan
Registered User

PlanetMan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sydney, NSW
Posts: 264
Basically I agree - with a few proviso's however. Firstly, my views are not reflective of price. I would offer the argument that some of the high priced refractors eg NP127 TSA120 are in fact better value for money in the context that folks tend to use them more (overall actual time behind the EP) than their 14" SCT etc and thus from their overall usage they are arguably better value. I would love to take a look through a TV127 as I suspect the view would be pretty good.

However, one claim from Tak which I initially thought was pure b#$%*$@# was that their fluorite refractors can achieve 100x magnification per inch on bright objects. This claim appears in the manuals and also can be found on astronomics site

http://www.astronomics.com/main/prod...roduct_id/FS60

Anyhow, I tried my FS-60 on Saturn and was dumbfounded/shocked at what 60mm of Tak 100% flourite (not flourite particle lens) could achieve - I took it up to 200x and could see plenty (bands, belts etc).

Last edited by PlanetMan; 14-05-2011 at 06:13 PM.
Reply With Quote