View Single Post
  #18  
Old 28-04-2011, 02:22 PM
joe_smith's Avatar
joe_smith
Registered User

joe_smith is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ingleburn
Posts: 481
Please Note: what I am saying here is speculative and the way I see how it might work.
It might not work for you, but its the way I see it and its my model only. All quotes I quotes are not trying to disproving your view. Its only me testing mine

Quote:
I could say that the act of measurement was a human intervention, amounting to the same thing as a conscious intent to measure, therefore the measurement was conscious.
could that be exactly what is happening? the device's we use, are extensions of our senses (like cameras ect) plus a conscious mind was still connected to the experiment say by type of entanglement quantum physics type view ok and didn't the 2 slit experiment show that when we/something make an observation we collapse the wave. It's life Jim, but not as we know it… could the device be a simple form of life a type of very simple first cell?? the new biocentric type view its simple its not all this maths and physics hard to find particles going around and around. its just a cell doing what cells do helping build our reality.

Now think about machines being simple cells could they be affecting our reallity?? could this be science fiction becoming science fact again?? dose this also point to what we dream and work towards becomes our reality in the future.

This is the most important part of the biocentic model it must include biology as well.
remember early cell evolution as its important to my model, and I think to the real model as well. so can you see where I am coming from?

Last edited by joe_smith; 28-04-2011 at 03:13 PM. Reason: not enough coffee :)
Reply With Quote