Quote:
You speak of other realities. My post #12 contains my distinctions for maintaining the separation of the different types of reality in a conversation. I assure you, this is not from some trivial piece of literature. It has been compiled by myself after many years of deep contemplation, living experience, and a lot of research based on different multiple religions and philosophies. It was motivated by the following simple question:
“What is real .. and how do I know it is real ?”
|
many people have done the same using the same data reading the same books and come out of it with totally different views.
What bugs me about the current view of the universe is that conciseness is not even mentioned in their theory's but it could be the missing link in the "theory of everything."
Food for thought.....
from an article at
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31393080...ience-science/
Quote:
|
Consciousness is not just an issue for biologists; it’s a problem for physics. There is nothing in modern physics that explains how a group of molecules in a brain creates consciousness. The beauty of a sunset, the taste of a delicious meal, these are all mysteries to science — which can sometimes pin down where in the brain the sensations arise, but not how and why there is any subjective personal experience to begin with. And, what’s worse, nothing in science can explain how consciousness arose from matter. Our understanding of this most basic phenomenon is virtually nil. Interestingly, most models of physics do not even recognise this as a problem.
|
Another thing that bugs me is Ancient history why dose science say that EVERY thing done in the day was only for sudo religious purposes. Look at the remarkable constructions they built in the day, the amazing knowledge they had of the universe and more importantly how their consciousness played a major role. They did things that are still nearly imposable to replicate today with our technology, and consciousness in their way of life was a major part of life. Why did we leave it out in modern science??? For me what they did or more what they left behind shows that consciousness plays a major role in our perception of how the universe works and could be the cause of it in the first place, only time will tell but then again is time only in our consciousness anyway. Our consciousness to me is the missing link after all its the ONLY thing we do use to understand the universe. Why cant it also be a major part of the universe, why is it left out of science and why do most class the phenomena of consciousness building the universe or being a major player in it "sudo science"??? to me the way science explains today the evolution from big bang to universe to consciousness human being is also "sudo science". Its like describing the evolution of a car we measure this and that, look at this and that from all angles and sizes, come up with theory's on how it was made but never mention the consciousness driver that puts it all together and what its really for. The car is a empty shell for a consciousness driver, could the universe be the same empty shell that our consciousness brings to life?? it would also explain the paranormal as normal events of the universe and these also played a major part of ancient history and people still have strange paranormal events today so nothing has changed in our consciousness only in our current world view of modern science.