Ok Craig, using this as a teaching tool... I agree that they disproved the postulation(?) of a usable NW passage.
However with he melting ice packs there now is a usable NW passage.
Does this mean that their -theory- postulation- hypothesis- was correct after all?
I think I am asking; can one revisit a 'dis-proven theory' with new information and show it to be true?
Brian
|