Quote:
Originally Posted by snas
The presence of an arch in the foot is the evidence that Lucy MUST be a human ancestor as only humans have an arch.
|
Yes Stuart … I'm actually intrigued to find out what they come up with to explain it.
PS: Its usually: it came from a 'fossilised ancient human'.
Words like: "the possibility of it having been from a Homo erectus individual cannot be excluded".
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by snas
I truly fail to understand how a very well educated biologist can be anti-evolution, other than by being so blindly faithful to his religious faith.
Stuart
|
I think its all courtesy of the intensity of 'Bible Belt' (US mid-west). I'm not sure how to explain it in Australia, though.
Cheers