View Single Post
  #5  
Old 03-02-2011, 03:33 PM
atalas's Avatar
atalas
Registered User

atalas is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
I would have expected the star sizes to be much much smaller at that focal length.

....didn't need the fake diffraction spikes either.

Sorry, just calling it as it see it

Hi Peter

Hey,I've long respected your opinion and don't see which other way you should call It ! but(the"but"you'll hate)as far as star sizes go mate I fail to see why you would think that a 1.6mag cluster with 10 minute subs would transpose to smaller star sizes ....still,I haven't star tested these optics yet to see how well corrected the figure is an that would degrade things I'm certain of that mate...will take on board your comments I promise you that!
Reply With Quote