View Single Post
  #11  
Old 23-01-2011, 09:52 AM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,281
A dsiclaimer doesn't IMO negate the necessity to ensure that certain safeguards are in place to lessen the likehood of this happening.

You read instances all the time where signs are posted saying don't do this or that but people still do and then sue councils etc for negligence when something goes wrong

Also wouldn't it be a simple matter to ideally change the TOS from "ideally contain" to "contain the following".

"ideally contained" is like saying put anything you like I don't really care.

Any lawyers out there want to clarify this.

Last edited by TrevorW; 23-01-2011 at 11:38 AM.
Reply With Quote