View Single Post
  #7  
Old 07-01-2011, 04:32 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS View Post
Alex, in this case, I don't think anyone would argue that electrical and magnetic fields are involved in all of this .. (ie: acceleration of particles, evidenced by the presence of synchrotron radiation and Brehmstrahlung).

The issue (as you have published elsewhere), is what is it at the core, that keeps powering these fields ?

If you agree it was originally a Supernova, and the material is observed moving outwards (very fast), why would the material coalesce at the core ? Ie: What would cause this ? Lerner's Fusion Focus apparatus ?

Cheers
The issue is that the standard model makes the assumption that the core is responsible for the phenomena. Ofcourse you are familiar that i am currently examining the decades (or older) old theory of the Electric Universe, which in a way reverses the question you pose, as the discharges are a result of external currents stressing and overloading the system.

Qualitatively the two models are very different with EU not suffering from the question of "what's in the core that does this", these phantom hidden genies are simply not required.

I hope, this may shed some light on how this fundamental difference of looking at the phenomena is understood by those familiar with EU concepts.

in short: Lerner's plasmoid is supplied externally from the capacitor bank.

"The issue (as you have published elsewhere), is what is it at the core, that keeps powering these fields" <--- this is meaningless in EU/PC
Reply With Quote