I have star atlas 2000 by Tirion and the charts are quite large and clear, but I find it doesn't have a very comprehensive array of objects. Certainly a lot more than Atlas of the Southern Night sky, but for example it didn't have a lot of Arp galaxies etc. These days I use the Nights sky Observer's guide as an Atlas. It's quite comprehensive and I like being able to chekc against obs notes, sketches and photographs. But Uranometria would be more complete as an actual atlas
|