Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
I could imagine that he might be attempting to demonstrate how mathematics could be used to produce nonsensical outcomes … which would then serve his purpose of undermining theoretical physics.
However, as we've seen in your other Mathis thread, many folk here, immediately found numerous flaws in the logic and thus, he's actually failed, if this was his primary goal.
(You can see that I'm still searching for something other than the obvious 'Machiavellian' motive … I just don't want to believe !!  )
Cheers |
According to Mathis, he uncovers corruption (calculus is corrupt, physics is corrupt etc). Why does he need to engage in this type of hyperbole when the exercise is to simply refute the mathematics?
The hyperbole is the deception. It's Machiavelli at work (again).
Regards
Steven