View Single Post
  #6  
Old 04-12-2010, 10:22 AM
Waxing_Gibbous's Avatar
Waxing_Gibbous (Peter)
Grumpy Old Man-Child

Waxing_Gibbous is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Gippsland
Posts: 1,768
I have the same 'scope and found that anything under 6/7mm is a waste of time except on nights with exceptional seeing. Bigger images yes, but less detail and much dimmer.
To fit Sir's budget:
7 and / or 9mm TMB Planetary II. A little hard to come by here but available from the US at about $65 each.
Meade 6.7 UWA - Surprised at how good this is.
Televue 8mm Plossl
Orion (Stratus?)/ Vixen 8mm LVW
WO SPL 6mm

A little more dosh will get you:
7, 9, 11 or 13mm Naglers. My 13 practically lives in the 'scope and takes barlowing extremely well.
Takahashi 7.5 LE or 10mm LE. Tighter FoV ( about 50*) but super-sharp with no colour or ghosting.
WO 7mm UWA.

I don't get on with Radians or Pentax XWs because I find you have to get your eye positioned 'just-so' or you get severe blackouts.
Were I you, I would pop for the 13mm Nagler and a good barlow (TV or Celestron Ultima) and never look back.
Happy hunting!
Peter
Reply With Quote