ZeroID and Les are probably on the right track. One of the younger researchers at the announcement specialises in alternative biochemistries. See her CV at:
http://www.ironlisa.com/cv/
Below is the abstract from a paper she lead-authored last year.
Did nature also choose arsenic?
Felisa Wolfe-Simon, Paul C.W. Davies and Ariel D. Anbar
Abstract
All known life requires phosphorus (P) in the form of inorganic phosphate (PO43− or Pi) and phosphate-containing organic molecules. Pi serves as the backbone of the nucleic acids that constitute genetic material and as the major repository of chemical energy for metabolism in polyphosphate bonds. Arsenic (As) lies directly below P on the periodic table and so the two elements share many chemical properties, although their chemistries are sufficiently dissimilar that As cannot directly replace P in modern biochemistry. Arsenic is toxic because As and P are similar enough that organisms attempt this substitution. We hypothesize that ancient biochemical systems, analogous to but distinct from those known today, could have utilized arsenate in the equivalent biological role as phosphate. Organisms utilizing such ‘weird life’ biochemical pathways may have supported a ‘shadow biosphere’ at the time of the origin and early evolution of life on Earth or on other planets. Such organisms may even persist on Earth today, undetected, in unusual niches.
(Received July 16 2008)
(Accepted September 26 2008)
(Online publication January 30 2009)