|
Nice image, nothing to complain about.
When I first opened it , it looked chuncky but that was because it was a big image with possibly a large percentage quality reduction to post it on the forum.
I wouldn't expect any more detail even from a DSLR. DSLR's are better suited for wide angle moon shots, most CCD cameras or webcam with high frame rate would be better. Some CCD's or webcams wouldn't even need a barlow due to chip size.
As a point of interest, try processing 1 image then 10 then 50 and so-on to see if 111 exposures are really needed.
|