
23-11-2010, 12:39 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Walcha , NSW
Posts: 1,652
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
No.
The electric comet theory has already made prior predictions for many of the anomalies encountered by the recent comet missions.
http://thunderbolts.info/predictions.htm#cdi
I would welcome any predictions of the dirty snowball sublimating puff ball hypothesis, so that i may understand and compare the models.
"no evidence at all" is a statement seeking to dismiss these 'prior' published predictions. 'No evidence at all' rarely makes it into peer reviewed engineering journals and ICOPS conferences.
If the 'solar wind' was totally removed from existence, there would be a difference in cometary display and surface activity, so it does 'have an effect'.
Of-course there is an insulating plasma sheath surrounding the comet.
Are you saying that if the solar wind did not exist, we would receive no change to the nucleus activity? Is this a prediction of the dirty snowy puff balls?
|
For one i never said that the solar wind didn't exist, and two is that just because EC theory predicted something there is no way they can prove that the observed phenomena had anything to do with the "predictions"
|