Quote:
Originally Posted by Outbackmanyep
So electric comet theory can explain all these things yet there is no evidence at all to backup the claims, just hypotheses.
|
No.
The electric comet theory has already made
prior predictions for many of the anomalies encountered by the recent comet missions.
http://thunderbolts.info/predictions.htm#cdi
I would welcome any predictions of the dirty snowball sublimating puff ball hypothesis, so that i may understand and compare the models.
"no evidence at all" is a statement seeking to dismiss these 'prior' published predictions. 'No evidence at all' rarely makes it into peer reviewed engineering journals and ICOPS conferences.
Quote:
|
And also, the solar wind does not have an effect on the nucleus of a comet from what i have read, it doesn't reach the nucleus at all!
|
If the 'solar wind' was totally removed from existence, there would be a difference in cometary display and surface activity, so it does 'have an effect'.
Of-course there is an insulating plasma sheath surrounding the comet.
Are you saying that if the solar wind did not exist, we would receive no change to the nucleus activity? Is this a prediction of the dirty snowy puff balls?