Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Yes I am just flattered that Peter decided to post his version straight after I posted mine, this far out from M104 season t'is a remarkable coincidence...
|
Something lost in translation here? No co-incidence as my interest was piqued after seeing you data Mike....as I mentioned in my original post.
M014 is not a subject I tackle with my 6" AP as I'm of the opinion the CCD sampling is beyond its limit at that focal length for an optimal result.
There are many many layers to my data (about 80 or more....as I frankly lost count) which may well have contributed to some elongation of stars during the stacking process.
But I was curious to see how the range of my data would fare after similar treatment. Quibbles to be sure, but I'm pretty happy with the result.
