Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
So, I'm desperately trying to get something of some value out of Mathis' work, (assuming his objective is to create an alternative set of principles), but ….
|
His motives are highly questionable.
Did you read the splurge at the bottom of the article.
Quote:
|
If this paper was useful to you in any way, please consider donating a dollar (or more) to the SAVE THE ARTISTS FOUNDATION. This will allow me to continue writing these "unpublishable" things. Don't be confused by paying Melisa Smith--that is just one of my many noms de plume. If you are a Paypal user, there is no fee; so it might be worth your while to become one. Otherwise they will rob us 33 cents for each transaction.
|
Good grief am I engaging in a conspiracy theory?
Quote:
|
Steven … from your previous post, it seems that he violates his own principle foundations in his subsequent statements. That is, his own alternative version of all this is, in itself, not even internally consistent.
|
A perfect example of pseudoscience being logically inconsistant or perhaps in this case a scam.
Regards
Steven