Ok Alex;
You seem to have shifted in
your theory from post #34:
Quote:
I will again find the edm papers. It is not a jump to suggest plasma discharges in cylindrical rows, this is exactly the morphology of auroral discharge, and exactly what we find in laboratory experiments, hence another expected feature of electric discharge.
...
The key difference between the comet models here are electro-dominant-emission-processes, vs thermal-jet-driven-processes.
It is very clear.
|
to post #41:
Quote:
This is *not* the hypothesis of the EC.
The hypothesis is that the OH and CO form from interaction with the solar wind.
Absorption spectrum of-course still applies.
|
but .. hey … who's counting ??
I'd treat the verbage in the press conference as anecdotal until they write a paper. In science, its not until you write a paper that you can prune out human illogical errors ! By the way, how's your Pulsar Relaxation Oscillator paper coming along ? Bojan & I are interested in the section on oscillation precision !
Cheers