Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
I wonder if we can pull some differentiating features from both models and explore these?
|
Alex;
Circuit design is an intricate and exacting process.
To get the desired effect or behaviour of a circuit requires 'fine tuning' of the various physical parameters of the interacting components which then
cause the effects we observe. There is deliberate intent behind this process.
To create a circuit model and fine tune it so that it works, and then attempt to use it to explain the behaviour of an object in space, represents just a curiosity.
By suggesting that we compare mainstream and EU/PC models you are suggesting the two models have the same fundamental basis of commonality. This is not so, as mainstream models have been built from the ground up. The quantitative parameters in the mainstream models have been measured and then maintained throughout subsequent iterations of it/them. The parameter values were not deliberately set to make the mainstream models work.
That is to say, the mainstream models have been built from strong quantitative evidence, (eg: "G " constants, etc), and hundreds of years of accumulated observational evidence leading to quantitative fact.
I do not feel that a comparison would be valid, as it overlooks/negates a fundamental differentiator.
Indirectly linked with Pulsars (although separate), as an example, take a look at posts 32 to 34 on this thread. Peratt's assumed field strengths differ from measurements by four orders of magnitude. The plasma span (distance) scales are also inconsistent with the measured intergalactic field strengths. There are no observations of the indicators of such fields evident. These indicators are asserted by Peratt himself in the paper. The electromagnetic force to gravitational force ratio is not 10^7, as the electromagnetic field strength differs from measured values by four orders of magnitude. This represents a major internal inconsistency within Peratt's paper/model.
The fundamental PC assertion is that cosmic plasma can behave akin to electronic components is under question and appears flawed. The fine tuning of components in a concatenated circuit designed to Oscillate, would seem insignificant when compared with this aspect.
Perhaps we can add all this as the first item on the "Alex's Differentiating Features List (ADFL)".
Cheers