[Outbackmanyep]

Originally Posted by Jarvamundo

1) Crater chains are an experimentally verified action of EDM. Lab-Verified Fact.

2) Yes it is a different, or extended hypothesis, although EU is not exclusive of all impacts.... it is an extension that provides a mechanism for many anomalies.

Why not explore these differences and anomalies?

EDM? Give me an example of EDM on a large scale that has been verified as being the result of EDM?

Again, you can't just scale-up a lab experiment!
Just because you got some pits to form in a lab does not mean that crater chains can form that way on a large scale! You're talking many tens to hundreds of kilometres in diameter....what size current are you saying can form a crater hundreds of kilometres in diameter?

I found this:
"The similarity between craters on cosmic bodies and craters in the lab does not prove that the craters seen in space were created by electric arcs."

here: http://www.thunderbolts.info/webnews...riccraters.htm

along with this:
"The shallow craters in Dr. Ransom's experiments above have interesting parallels in cratering experiments undertaken by Zane Parker, using nothing more than dust on an electrified CRT screen."

Dust on a CRT screen, the scale is obviously tiny!

Well i have seen craters formed by "Antlions" but i don't go in and say that Hyperion must be full of Antlions because i have a photo of some i found in a field and that is fact, so therefore everything that 'looks like' something else must be!

Puhleeeease!