Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Scott states that the pulsar mechanism is due to interactions of close binary systems of stars....what do you think a spectroscopic binary is?? Swiss cheese??!!!. Go and learn your basic astronomy before you go making comments like you have, otherwise you're going to get shot down every time.
|
With the Electric Star model (Jeurgens), the star is 'powered' by an external current.
Thornhill/Scott theorize that a resonant relaxation oscillator (capacitor, resistor, discharge) circuit exists to extend the ES model to pulsars.
It's pretty simple to then work out this hypothesis is dependent many components including the electric current being delivered to the body(ies), along with an coupling of the two charged bodies.
Peratt's model also mentions that this oscillation *may* be powered by an external current, this is also consistent with the ES hypothesis.
So from this...
1) We do not *have* to have a binary system, although yes having 2 stars containing their own capacitive environments linked by a discharge medium would seem logical.
2) the electrical environment, particularly the size and plasma state of the body is critical.... ie think is this star experiencing a shift up, or down in current.
3) the mechanics may also play a part
To dance in and out of standards frozen in magnetic field models and MHD models of 'bodies', confuses much of what ES and EU is getting at with electrodynamics with an external source. Yes you can 'shoot it down' with mainstream models... but it's just not all that relevant to the ES theory, since it's an entirely different paradigm.