View Single Post
  #117  
Old 05-10-2010, 02:51 PM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjastro View Post
A spinning object has an angular velocity. The speed of light is a linear velocity.

The dimensions of angular velocity is L(0)T(-1). L(0) is dimensionless.
The dimensions of linear velocity is L(1)T(-1). L is length, T is time.

Expressing an angular velocity in terms of a linear velocity makes no sense at all.

Regards

Steven
Quite correct there Steven. I should've included "25% of C at the surface of the hypothesized equator of this hypothetical star"? This would be a tangental.

But i think you see where we are going with this. None the less a valid clarification there.

"Postulating this theory as an explanation for observed pulsar emissions is far less of a stretch of one's sense of reality than proposing that an incredibly massive star rotates with the speed of a dentist's drill. Healy & Peratt"

So xray pulsars are up to what now? 20,000+... 60,000 RPM? cmon.
Reply With Quote