Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Very few lab models have been successful in explaining real life situations. All that has been done with plasma physics is that they've seen natural phenomenon and tried to reproduce them in the lab, with varying results of success and/or failure. But even those successes do not explain the natural phenomena being studied except at their most basic level.
|
You sure said a bibful there Carl!
Just because 'plasma machining' can produce something in the lab that looks like the washout gully behind my block doesn't mean it was created by 'plasma machining'. In fact it wasn't and I have watched it grow year by year! But EU takes the lab work and extends it to claim, not that my little gully was created by 'plasma machining', but that the Grand Canyon was!
This is their logic. The same logic that extends their other lab stuff to cosmological scales, against the observational evidence.
Same with 'plasma machined' craters on the Moon. We have craters on the Earth too, and we recover meteoric fragments from them that confirm their origins. We don't need plasma. But apparently different processes operate on the Moon.
Cheers -