Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Get a load of this bunch of science illiterate twits trying to understand something they have no idea about....
http://thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB...php?f=3&t=3732
Alex hasn't a clue....neither he or the others have probably even read the article and understood what it says. It's pretty obvious from their statements. |
So, they seem to have fogotten that the subject is about
Intergalactic Magnetic Fields … from the
paper (as distinct from the article):
Quote:
|
Unlike the fields in galaxies, which are believed to have been amplified by the dynamo action of the large-scale convective motions of gas
|
Alex then jumps on the band-wagon and explains the distortion of a distant black hole 'image' as being due to the magnetic field interference disrupting photons. He does this with a picture of a quasar followed by some plasma looking thingy .. the implication being that the plasma thingy IS what mainstream thinks of as a black hole … and then reverses the spin by saying that the plasma thingy IS the black hole and mainstream has got cause & effect mixed up, because that's what the holy scriptures tell him.
Then of course, to triumph over all, (and win his domination game play) he shows mainstream that, out of his benevolence, he sees that mainstream will eventually get there … someday.
Then we end up with a closing photo of a plasmaball in Wiki which is used by Wiki as an example to explain the term "anisotropy", because plasma balls do display '
Magnetic anisotropy' quite nicely.
What a screw around and changes in spin to deflect anyone from delving into the mish-mash of issues and coming to a mainstream view !
Man he must be drawing some kind of huge salary from doing this !!
Wonder where it comes from ?
Cheers