Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
I presume you're referring to rule number one on Fraud detection?:
There's something about Irving Langmuir's work underpinning these distinctions of yours, Steven.
Are they your distinctions or Langmuir's ??
Now that WOULD be fraud !
 
Cheers |
Like Tom Bridgeman, I used Neptune as an example to show the similarities confronting scientists of the 1840's with todays mainstream scientists dealing with dark matter.
In both cases scientists didn't invent Neptune and dark matter to support existing theories. Instead both are outcomes of applying
unmodified Newtonian theory as a perturbation to existing orbits.
In the 1840s the orbit in question was Uranus.
Today it is the rotation curves of outer lying stars.
This contradicts EU's assertion that dark matter is an ad hoc mathematical invention to support observation.
Regards
Steven