View Single Post
  #3  
Old 11-09-2010, 08:46 PM
sheeny's Avatar
sheeny (Al)
Spam Hunter

sheeny is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oberon NSW
Posts: 14,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by theodog View Post
Like most good things -have a dable and your hooked.


Yep...

I don't think spectroscopy is any harder than astrophotography. There may be a little more cerebral exercise involved in identifying lines, etc rather than aesthetic appreciation, but I think if you're into astrometry and photometry then using your head isn't a problem.

Its like everything else though... there is a learning curve, but between IIS and a couple of Yahoo lists (especially Ken's) there's not much you can't do! Its so easy in these days of the internet!

Have you given any thought to a Staranalyser? Less cost than the L200, but it will let you learn the basics of spectroscopy. The only thing that would go against it for asteroid work would be the interference from background stars and limited resolution, so I think the L200 would probably be better for what you particularly want to do.

But like Jeff says... consider yourself warned... it might start out as a second interest, but I wouldn't guarntee it'll stay that way!

Al.
Reply With Quote