|
"Cherry-picking" often leads to misguided conclusions in many areas of science. Isolated "facts" (usually based on very loose or inaccurate measurements or, worse still, on just hearsay) are selected by the individual because it suites their own particular belief system. Often the individual will attach themselves to these beliefs with an extreme and irrational fervour. These are then extrapolated to some conclusion in an attempt to discredit mainstream scientific ideas.
Truly good science involves respect for established concepts but remains flexible enough to steer in new directions where new observations or evidence arises. And always, the peer review process ensures that the scientific community as a whole preserves the general logic of scientific development in line with the evidence from experiment and observation.
Regards, Rob
|