Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave
It takes all types and there is not enough boxes to differentiate the subtle differences that exist between humans.
AND so I find it quaint that even in science the argument is so often against the proponent of the idea and his character rather than the merit of the idea... so often folk attack the character of the person presenting a dubious idea rather than debate the issue upon its merit.
alex  |
And so, recognising that's what humans do, would it not behoove the presenter of an idea to adapt their stance, (change their box), if not to at least appear as though they are agile enough to understand the stance of others, before soliciting their feedback or support for their ideas ?
I don't see that agility all that often from 'ideas men'.
And yet human
BEings are able to
BE anything they choose (and least intellectually, that is).
Cheers