View Single Post
  #35  
Old 31-08-2010, 11:13 AM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS View Post
The other option would be to research the anomaly to see if it can be explained within the context of current thinking. There are lots of other options to explore before 'jumping ship'.

I haven't seen anyone really trying to do this although, the scientist who wrote the paper that started this thread has published some serious observational studies about NGC 7603 etc. AND made the point that he's not going to step into static space theories etc to explain it.

I actually like that approach, myself.

Cheers
Yeah...Fair call Craig.... i have tried that... and will continue to...

Unfortunately this one represents a death blow to current theories.

Which is why you get the LOUD "it's a chance alignment" rant, "so just ignore it".... "here look heres a million quasars that are not related to that galaxy"....

Fortunately for us inquisitive laymen there is no financial repercussions to jumping ship. For that reason we form impartial observers.

As it turns out... from sometime absorbing PC is actually quite well down the path of investigating these ejections and quantized redshifts.... so hey maybe BBT will meet up with it somehow... although i doubt it.

We would not expect to receive any wisdom on this from establishment rants, they have clearly revealed to be misleading.
Reply With Quote