Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
A few points to take from this....
1) Carl has now invoked Dr Arp's excellent scientific method, at the same time totally walking all over the theories developed there from. Which one is it?... is Arp a man of solid evidence or not? It's a contradiction.
2) Plasma z-pinch ejection hypothesis compliments Arps hypothesis. This is well known to plasma cosmologists and EU, it is ofcourse discussed in Don Scott's nasa video.
It is actually a feature of Lerner's experiments! look at a z-pinch.
3) Arp and Hawkins seeked to publish and present in a journal in part organised and edited by Lerner. Carls incessant trashing of Lerner is clearly at odds with the respect afforded to him by colleagues, and invitations by ESO (search for lerner).
again it's a contradiction, which one is it? Carls incessant slagging of Lerner is at odds with the funding and selection criteria of ESO, and the fusion community.
Again, i'm happy to explore the differences in hypothesis... i'm also happy that we disagree on hypothesis and reasoning.... but the repeated AdHom slagging only exposes Carls misunderstandings of the body of work.... or at worst a desire to misrepresent it.
In the end, the brighter than layman audience here must not take my word, or Carls... go buy Dr Arp's Seeing Red book and read it for yourself.
|
Stop appealing to the popular opinion Alex, your protestations don't wash.
Anyone can go and find out about anything I have posted about Lerner or anyone/anything else for that matter. What I have said is on record and it's up to the others reading this to find out for themselves who is correct in this instance.
I don't need to make a point of everything in order to prove my point.