Carl, you state Dr Arps brief note of electrically dominated matter, but then you go on to state a separate theory for galaxy formation, which is clearly at odds with Arps hypothesis.
"galaxies form from vast clouds of hydrogen and helium "
You know this is misrepresenting his work and theories. Why would you use his quote to then lead into describing standards model which is clearly at odds with his work.
Arp's ejection model is extremely consistent with the galactic plasma z-pinch hypothesis (a plasma gun). It is infact the basis of the research work of E.Lerner and many other focus fusion teams you so often trash here.
Edit: It would be relevant to point out Arps recent published works? Look at the co-coordinator and fellow author lists.
http://www.aspbooks.org/a/volumes/ta...s/?book_id=463
conveniently leave that out Carl?
I'm happy to take note of the differences in hypothesis, but you have clearly misrepresented Arp's hypothesis, by including and confusing standard's coalescing gas model of formation with it. Arps model is ejection.
These distinctions should be made Carl.
It is also important to note that PC/EU regularly acknowledges the role of 'gravity' in comparison to EM in particular scales of matter.
Quote:
Hannes Alfvén wrote:
"Gravitation is, of course, one of the dominating forces in astrophysics . However, as electromagnetic forces are stronger by a factor of 1039, gravitation is important only when electromagnetic forces neutralize each other, as is the case for large bodies. In our solar system, gravitational forces do not seem to be of primary importance in producing high energy phenomena"
|
EU/PC is well aware of these distinctions, it is an integral part of the theory.
You have either misunderstood the body of work, or seek to misrepresent it.