Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Your previous reply was a shot at the two authors of the paper that Craig had posted...or part thereof. How disingenuous of you now to come out and totally ignore that by skirting around it.
|
No. It was your underlined (below) text which exhibited a misunderstanding of the proposed Thornhill hypothesis, to which i responded with the difference between the Lorentz and Columb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
The paper itself is more than enough to refute any EU claims (the quoted text is more than enough).
|