View Single Post
  #8  
Old 21-08-2010, 12:05 PM
Quark's Avatar
Quark (Trevor)
Registered User

Quark is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Broken Hill NSW Australia
Posts: 4,110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lester View Post
I am sure you will get some good seeing again soon Trevor. These images are a lot better than anything I have been able to get this year.
Thanks Lester, reckon we are all due for a change of fortune with the weather.

Quote:
Originally Posted by michaellxv View Post
let's hope you get some good seeing soon.
Thanks Michaell, I shouldn't complain, had a top run over the last two years.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bird View Post
Trev, it's very hit and miss with the seeing - all you can do is keep looking. I've had a few nights where I almost didn't bother, but then found good seeing down at the scope... you can't predict it with any accuracy as far as I can see.

cheers, Bird
So true Bird, John Rogers tells me that I am the only one sending data from the whole of Eastern Australia. He says even this level of data is better than none, makes me feel a bit better.

Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
Trevor,

The detail in these is pretty good for crook conditions in my opinion. I'd rate the conditions up here in QLD as an order of magnitude worse than crook this year (c__p comes to mind).

Hope you enjoyed your trip to Astrofest despite the weather,

Peter
Thanks Peter, reckon I could come up with quite a few variations within the "Crookness" scale, based on what has been dished up since the end of June.

Certainly enjoyed the Astrofest, I think its the people that I ran into rather than the weather that made it so enjoyable but it is such a very long way from Broken Hill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Hothersall View Post
I too would love to get images this standard but that JS is always out there and my results are recycle bin material, the IR looks pretty detailed and I notice you use an 807 - with the 742nm I cannot get anywhere need that level of contrast.

John.
Thanks John, regarding the 807nm IR filter, it really helps having a 16" primary with that filter, probably the 742nm is better suited to a smaller aperture although Bird, who has both of these filters, still often uses the 742nm with his 14.5" primary. That may change when he gets his 16" operational.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightskystargaz View Post
Trevor,

very nice pic's of Jupiter .

,

Tom
Thanks Tom.
Reply With Quote