Quote:
Originally Posted by bojan
Alex,
you seem to misunderstood me..
My example of relaxation oscillator was put to make you think... outside of EU, and by no means as a contribution to those theories....
First you have to explain the mechanism (schematic if you will) of this "cosmic relaxation oscillator", and then, of course, it's phenomenal frequency stability (Interesting.. when we are discussing mechanical versus "electrical" model - Crystal oscillators are VERY stable - and they are VERY mechanical devices  . Rotating star core is also mechanical device) .
Also, you have to explain why the pulsar frequency is so close in value to the rotational speed that theoretical model (based on angular momentum preservation principle) of collapsed star predicts? Coincidence?
( And no, it is not a coincidence that I am using the same tone as EU mob).
A simple explanation to pulsar and its observed properties then is, that it is an ultra-dense stellar mass, fast rotating object with strong magnetic field.. Simple. |
Power source, capacitor bank, spark gap? seems pretty stable to me?
Wave reflections on plasma 'flux toobs'?
Really most of this should be able to be modeled quite well with plasma dynamics... but yes the body of work is no where near as funded or developed as mainstream's neutral view.
Interestingly we are finding radio patterns between Saturn and moons, that are exhibiting pulse signaling too. We can and have measured these electrical currents (birkeland currents). It would be very interesting to study these in detail.... similar to what themis is doing now, here.
Yes as mentioned there are mainstream explanations, what makes me nervous is that the models are continuously adjusted for new discoveries... lets be quite clear... the new 'strange matter' stars were not expected.
Have we ever found ultra-dense stellar mass to be stable? ie a cup of neutrons.
Relaxation oscillator is both simple, and well understood with empirical ties to technology.