Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Interesting .. your motives are driven by the desire for simplicity (I'm not being critical here).
What if the nature of the thing you're viewing is actually complex ? Would you see the complexity ?
Cheers
|
Do you mean in the absence of simplicity.... well then i guess i would lean to the most simplest available.
I though there was a
razor for this? I thought we were all cool with this?
I guess i try to explain whats out there, with what we actually have here, well understood physics can explain some things, without theoretical conjecture (95% dark). It is only with this natural philosophy of real things can we be reasonably confident we are describing actual reality. Science must lead mathematics, in astro i tend to feel we have it the other way. I (me, doesnt have to be you) see PC as a possible branch we can pinch *some* answers from.
Acknowledging electric currents that cause these large scale magnetic fields (that have been dubbed 'flux tooobs') is really *the* only step.