Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarvamundo
Bohr style model, mentioned is of MASS.... not quasar position.
I think we are jumping between:
Bohr style model of quasar distance shells relative to earth observations
Bohr style model of mass, providing some form of mechanism for redshift stepping.
What we both think of chance alignments and photos with high redshifted quasars infront of, or linked by arms of ejection to be are well... one of those believe your eyes moments. Yes it can be swamped by large sets, when applied without the hypothesis in mind, such as supplied here.
The analogy holds for the hypothesis of ejections from active seyferts. Karlsson peaks are from the parent to child, it does not apply across population.
The hypothesis is "a component" of redshift is intrinsic.
|
I'm still waiting on your explanation as to why you support Narlikar's theory for redshift quantization in the first place given it's extensive mathematical usage (which you oppose in mainstream cosmology), in a GR framework (which must be wrong given your assertions that SR is proven wrong by Sagnac).
Steven