View Single Post
  #66  
Old 15-08-2010, 09:38 AM
Jarvamundo (Alex)
Registered User

Jarvamundo is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 406
Bohr style model, mentioned is of MASS.... not quasar position.

I think we are jumping between:

Bohr style model of quasar distance shells relative to earth observations
Bohr style model of mass, providing some form of mechanism for redshift stepping.

What we both think of chance alignments and photos with high redshifted quasars infront of, or linked by arms of ejection to be are well... one of those believe your eyes moments. Yes it can be swamped by large sets, when applied without the hypothesis in mind, such as supplied here.

The analogy holds for the hypothesis of ejections from active seyferts. Karlsson peaks are from the parent to child, it does not apply across population.

The hypothesis is "a component" of redshift is intrinsic.
Reply With Quote