Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised
Ned's tutes should be required reading for anyone wanting to go off at tangents with wild ideas. Then after reading and (hopefully) understanding what he has written, if they still want to go off on tangents, at least then they'll know enough to not make a complete fool of themselves.
|
It's disappointing to see the distaste for exploring the concepts that challenge BBT, even when the originator of the thread posted with the caviate "at the risk of starting a skirmish". I agree it's getting boring and distracts from the subject matter.
Dr. Wright is Wrong-- a reply to Ned Wright's "Errors in
The Big Bang Never Happened"
http://bigbangneverhappened.org/p25.htm
Hawkins has done some excellent and very thorough work here. Widely published body of long research, a great contribution.
Further reading in to the subject of this thread, which may also be interesting, is the observed quantization of the redshifts of quasars. Just google redshift quantization & quasars or Karlsson Redshift.
http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/in...d_galaxies.pdf
I would also recommend the writings of Jayant Narlikar. One of India's premiere cosmologists, and quasar specialist.
Very interesting topic. Good questions. Look forward to more news on this topic, good to see it being brought up by curious laymen as we are not stuck with BBT by default, and it's not unreasonable for us to expect a model to make atleast some predictions without adhock inventions.