View Single Post
  #10  
Old 08-08-2010, 01:53 PM
CraigS's Avatar
CraigS
Unpredictable

CraigS is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 3,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
That was the idea. You had these voids with the galaxies and such surrounding the outsides of the voids like in a soap bubble. Within the voids themselves, there was stuff all of anything...virtual no gas or dust except for what was contained within the few galaxies that appeared to reside there. However, when viewed on the largest of scales, the voids and the walls blended in pretty much seamlessly to produce an isotropic and homogeneous distribution of matter and energy across the Universe, thereby upholding the CP. Given that there are/were an infinity of these voids and walls of galaxies across the universe, finding oneself in the centre of one of these voids, or even on the outskirts of one, would not be out of the question. However, if the interpretations of this paper are correct, then we have to reappraise the void/bubble model or abandon it entirely depending on the outcome of further observations and theory.

It's cutting it a little fine, given that there are demonstrably measurable voids present in the universe. Observations have shown this. But that's not to say that the present theory is entirely correct. Half a dozen or so voids does not an universe make
Yep you guys are right ... "The big bang of the universe is actually similar to cell division in biology, since new universes are continuously formed. However, inflation always wipes out the circumstances of the beginning of the particular universe." -Wiki.

Just as a matter of interest where are the voids ?

Cheers

Last edited by CraigS; 08-08-2010 at 03:08 PM.
Reply With Quote