Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Who says "that there are other answers we will miss because simply accepting the premise of inflation means that other options will never be investigated" ?
Seems to me there is lots of investigation/query into it and all that surrounds it.
Also, it's not just math that gives rise to the principle of Inflation.
Whether Inflationary BBT is offensive to reason or not is no reason to discard it !
My 2 cents worth.
Cheers
|
Thank you Craig for your two cents worth but really I value your view as worth much more than a mere two cents
.
AS to parra 1 ...I said it
... and I said it because that is my view on the matter... I thought that was clear but sorry for any lack of expression that may have been confusing
AND I do hope someone can offer a more reasonable and provable idea which will replace the notion of inflation.
If something is offensive to reason that is good enough for me to question it (and even throw it out without a new idea to replace it)..if it is lame it is lame ...I did not make it lame and only call it the way I see it...and not withstanding that everyone else may be happy to accept the view of Mr Guth I am sorry I simply do not.
I thought in this area math could be the only guide given that he speculates upon events some 13.5 billion years ago..I will be surprised if there can be more to the notion than what he has put forward...er sorry there was some Russian guy as well on this approach ....I find it difficult to accept that all we can imagine ...that is
the entire universe came into existence in some thirty seconds (or less) and I wont accept such...there has to be a better way to make bbt work
.
alex