Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigS
Cool !!
Man, the guy that wrote this paper has a lifetime of digging himself out of this pile ie: => against the Cosmo principle, against the CMBR evidence, against Hubble's Law, against SNIA analysis, ...
I look forward to his next chapter !!!
cheers |
There's nothing wrong with questioning the prevailing paradigm. Where it does become wrong is when you take your line of reasoning from wholly unsubstantiated and entirely speculative premises. You should at least know what you're on about (that means, knowing the prevailing school of thought well enough to be able to comment on it) and then come at it from a well reasoned direction. Not from some fantasy crazed ego trip just because you like the sound of something or it's your belief it's right and everyone else has it wrong. If you have something to say and are questioning the results or interpretations of another thing, then make sure it makes sense and doesn't just dismiss or ignore everyone else offhand.
That makes for good science.