Quote:
Originally Posted by adman
Alex - most of these arguments go way over my head - but this one doesn't seem to make sense - can you expand on this for me...?
Adam
|
The gentlemen here appear ignorant of Ampere's solution, consistent with the classical electrodynamic model. The Ampre' Model, which can be found from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet "Two models for magnets: magnetic poles and atomic currents"
Here, I have described an Amperian Current.
That they leap to ferri, ferro, and magnetic domains, shows they have leapt beyond this understanding into a larger scope, for which their contribution is not incorrect.
Closer investigation of the mentioned model will give Carl his answer of why ferromagnetic material displays no current.
We can then go on to all things quantum, but essentially we are moving beyond what is required to explain observed phenomena that is in relation to this astronomical re-discovery, that is the Birkeland Current.
Cranky resistive debunking is simply not adding to our collective understanding of the thread on topic. Adam i thankyou for your polite approach, in the form of a question or query, of which i can try to point to what may help, or not. I can only try.
I look forward to see some insightful new discoveries, threads, and information sharing that will soon be appearing from these other obviously passionate apologists. or not?
Much like you all i am just a curious layman, sharing some interesting discoveries with relevant references, go research for yourselves, and make a
contribution.
Edit: See above wonderful MIT lecture series, or
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teachin.../lectures.html
Beyond this, good luck with your individual investigations.